Визуальная антропология                                                  
и социальное конструирование

Букова Мария Игоревна

Краевое государственное бюджетное 
учреждение культуры «Музейный центр 
«Площадь Мира»

Аннотация 

Опыт визуально-антропологических исследований сегодня все больше носит междисциплинарный и синтетический характер. Наряду с расширением практического применения визуально-антропологического продукта, изменяется и  теоретическая значимость этой области в  гуманитарных исследованиях. 
В статье раскрывается методика социального конструирования и возможности применения методов визуальной антропологии. 

Ключевые слова: визуальная антропология, социальный конструктивизм, музейные практики

Visual Anthropology and Social Modelling

Bukova Maria Irogevna

Peace Square Museum Center, Territorial 
State Budgetary Culture Institution

Abstract
At present, visual anthropological studies are more often becoming interdisciplinary and synthetic. Together 
with extension of visual anthropological product use, theoretical significance of this area for humanitarian studies 
is changing. The article discusses social modelling methods and applicability of visual anthropology methods. 

Key words: visual anthropology, social constructivism, museum practices

​

References
Berger, P. & Lukman, T. Social’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti. Traktat po sociologii znanija [Social construction of reality. A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge]. Moskva: Medium, 1995. [in Russian].
Berezhnova, M. I. & Pimenova, N. N. Migracija kak sredstvo razvitija territorii: istoricheskij primer Kolymskogo kraja [Migratsitsa as a means of development of the territory: a historical example of the Kolyma region]//Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija [Modern problems of science and education], 2015, 1-1, p. 1886. [in Russian].
Bobrik, I. V., Vdovin, A. S. & Makarov, N. P. Sud’ba severnyh cerkovnyh arhivov Enisejskoj gubernii 19v 1920-1921 gg. [The fate of the northern church archives of the Enisey province in 1920-1921]// Severnye arhivy i jekspedicii [Northern archives and expeditions], 2017, 2, p. 6-22. [in Russian].
Boghossian, P. What is social Construction? // Times Literary Supplement, 2001, february 23, pp. 6-8. 
Chistjakova, S. S. Globalizacija kul’tury: genezis, tipologija, sovremennye smysly [Globalization of culture: genesis, typology, modern meanings]. Belgorod, 2007 [in Russian].
Dobren’kov, V. I., Kravchenko, A. I. Fundamental’naja sociologija. Teorija i metodologija [Fundamental sociology. Theory and methodology.]. Moskva: INFRA-M, 2003 [in Russian].
Dronova, I. G. Filosofsko-kul’turologicheskaja interpretacija jetnicheskoj identichnosti [Philosophical and cultural interpretation of ethnic identity]. Belgorod, 2010 [in Russian].
Dugin, A. G. Geopolitika postmoderna [Postmodern geopolitics]. Moskva: Amfora, 2007 [in Russian].
Dvorechkaja, A. P. Razvitie Enisejskogo Severa v postanovlenijah Krasnojarskogo kraevogo komiteta Kommunisticheskoj partii Sovetskogo Sojuza. 1940-1971. [Development of the Yenisei North in the resolutions of the Krasnoyarsk Territory Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. 1940-1971.]// Severnye arhivy i jekspedicii [Northern archives and expeditions], 2017.- 1, pp. 41-50. [in Russian].
Fedotova, N. N. Mul’tikul’turalizm i politika razvitija [Multiculturalism and development policy]// Zhurnal sociologii i social’noj antropologii [Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 2006, 9 (3), pp. 75-109. [in Russian].
Gavrilov, I. K., Batashev, M. S., Makarov, N.P.. Kompleksnaja jekologo-jetnograficheskaja jekspedicija v Jevenkiju. Priroda i chelovek [Complex ecologo-ethnographic expedition to Evenkia. Nature and man]// Severnye Arhivy i Jekspedicii [Northern archives and expeditions], 2017, 1, рр. 66-83. [in Russian].
Goffman, Je. Predstavlenie sebja drugim v povsednevnoj zhizni [Introducing yourself to others in everyday life]. Moskva: KANON-PRESS, 2000. [In Russian].
Golovnev, A. V. Antropologija pljus kino. Kul’tura i  iskusstvo [Anthropology plus cinema. Culture and art]. 2011, 1 [In Russian].
Heusch, L. Jaen Rouch and the Birth of Visual Anthropology: A Brief History of the Comite international du film ethnographique // Visual Anthropology, 2007, рр. 365-386.
Il’in, V. I. Potreblenie v social’nom pole [Consumption in the social field]. Sankt-Peterburg: Sociologicheskoe obshhestvo M. Kovalevskogo, 2001 [In Russian].
Kabyshha, A. V., Tul’chinskij, M.R. Tendencii izmenenija sociologicheskoj paradigmy posle 1995 goda (naukometricheskij analiz) [Tendencies of the sociological paradigm change after 1995 (scientometric analysis)]// Sociologija v Rossii, 1996, pp. 585-626. [In Russian].
Kirko, V. I., Malakhova, E. V., Pack, N. I. Education for the future: new strategies of distance education for the universities of Eastern Siberia// Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2014, 15 (4), pp. 23-33.
Kistova, A. V., Pimenova, N. N. History and Specificity of Literary Activity of Indigenous Peoples // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2016, 9 (9), 1932-1944.
Kistova, A. V., Tamarovskaja, A. N. Proizvedenija arhitektury i kul’turnaja identichnost’ [Works of architecture and cultural identity].// Sovremennye problemy nauki i  obrazovanija [Modern problems of science and education], 2014, 4, р. 597. [in Russian].
Kistova, A. V., Tamarovskaja, A. N. Architectural Space as a Factor of Regional Cultural Identity// Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2015, 4 (8), 735-749. [in Russian].
Kolesnik, M. A. Osobennosti vosprijatija russkogo jetnosa v molodezhnoj srede goroda Krasnojarska po rezul’tatam associativnogo jeksperimenta so slovom “russkoe” [Features of the perception of the Russian ethnos in the youth environment of the city of Krasnoyarsk based on the results of an associative experiment with the word “Russian”]. // Sociodinamika [Sociodynamics], 2016, 4, рр. 
59-67. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2016.4.18270. [in Russian].20
Сибирский антропологический журнал 2 (2017 09) 6-23
Kolesnik, M. A. Decoration of Children’s Literature of the Indigenous Peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East.// Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2016, 9 (9), pp. 2044-2059.
Koptseva, N. P. Modern Concepts of Cultural Sociodynamics in the Context of Research of the So-
cio-Cultural Environment of the Indigenous Peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East// Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2016, 1 (9), pp. 68-78.
Koptseva, N. P., Kirko, V. I. Specificity of ethnogeny indigenous peoples by Central Siberia in the transition from the traditional type of society to modern society// Life Sci J 2014, 11(7), pp. 409-413
Koptseva, N. P., Kirko, V. I. The impact of global transformations on the processes of regional and ethnic identity of indigenous peoples Siberian Arctic. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2015, 6 (3 S5), 217-223.
Koptseva, N. P., Nevol’ko, N.N., Reznikova, K. V. Formirovanie jetnicheskoj kul’turnoj identichnosti v sovremennoj Rossii s pomoshh’ju proizvedenij nacional’nogo iskusstva (na primere jevenkijskogo jeposa i dekorativno-prikladnogo iskusstva) [Formation of ethnic cultural identity in modern Russia with the help of works of national art (on the example of the Evenki epos and arts and crafts)].// Pedagogika iskusstva [Pedagogy of art], 2013, 1, 1-15. [in Russian].
Koptseva, N. P., Bahova, N. A., Zamaraeva, Ju.S., Kirko V.I. Problema sociokul’turnyh issledovanij v sovremennoj gumanitarnoj nauke [The problem of sociocultural research in modern humanities]// Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija [Modern problems of science and education], 2012, 3, 323. [in Russian].
Koptseva, N. P., Hizhnjakova, A. N., Reznikova, K. V. K voprosu o konceptah jazykov korennyh narodov Krasnojarskogo kraja [On the issue of the concepts of indigenous languages of the Kras-
noyarsk Territory]// Severnye arhivy i jekspedicii [Northern archives and expeditions], 2017, 1 (1), 6-22. [in Russian].
Korogodin, V. I., Sosnin, Je. A., Pojzner, B. N. Rabochaja kniga po social’nomu konstruirovaniju (Mezhdisciplinarnyj proekt) [Working book on social design (Interdisciplinary project)]. Tomsk, izdatel’stvo Tomskogo universiteta, 2000 [in Russian].
Korovushkin, D. G. Boguchanskaja arheologicheskaja jekspedicija IAJeT SO RAN: kratskij istoricheskij ocherk [Boguchansk archaeological expedition YAT SB RAS: a brief historical essay]. Severnye arhivy i jekspedicii [Northern archives and expeditions], 2017, 2, pp. 23-42. [in Russian].
Krylov, A. A. Psihologija [Psychology] [Jelektronnyj resurs]. [in Russian].
Laqueur, T. W. Making sex: body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge: Mass., Harvard University Press, 1990. [in Russian].
Libakova, N. M. Social’no-psihologicheskie osobennosti formirovanija gendernyh obrazov v  srede rossijskogo studenchestva (rezul’taty associativnogo jeksperimenta) [Socio-psychological features of the formation of gender images among Russian students (the results of an associative experiment)].// Sociodinamika [Sociodynamics], 2014, (10), 101-134. [in Russian].
Libakova, N. M., Sertakova, E. A. Kul’turologicheskoe issledovanie korennyh malochislennyh narodov Krasnojasrkogo kraja: rezul’taty jekspertnogo interv’ju [Culturological study of indigenous small peoples of the Krasnaya SSR region: the results of an expert interview].// Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija [Modern problems of science and education], 2014, 4, p. 598. [in Russian].
Libakova, N. M., Sertakova, E. A. Formation of Ethnic Identiy of the Indigenous Peoples of the North in Arts and Crafts on the Example of Bone Carving.// Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2015, 4 (8), 750-768.
Libakova, N. M., Sertakova, E. A., Kolesnik, M. A., Sitnikova, A. A., Il’bejkina, M. I. Sovremennye 
strategii social’nogo pozicionirovanija sibirskih regionov [Modern strategies for social positioning of  Siberian regions].// Sociodinamika [Sociodynamics], 2016, 1, 162-189. DOI: 10.7256/2409144.2016.1.17420. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pr/article_17420.html. [in Russian].21
Букова Мария Игоревна.Визуальная антропология и социальное конструирование
Lukov, V. A. Social’noe proektirovanie [Social design]. Moskva: izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, Flinta, 2007. [in Russian].
Mallon, R. «Naturalistic approaches to social construction». Stanford: Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2009. 
Marchenko, Ju.G. Sociokul’turnoe konstruirovanie «novogo cheloveka» v 1920-e gody i ego sovremennyj variant [Socio-cultural design of the “new man” in the 1920s and its modern version]. // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2008, 317, pp. 182-188.
Marginal’nost’ v sovremennoj Rossii [Marginality in modern Russia]. Moskva: Moskovskij obshhestvennyj nauchnyj fond, 2000. [in Russian].
Mazin, V. A. Vvedenie v Lakana [Introduction to Lacan]. Moskva: Fond nauchnyh issledovanij «Pragmatika kul’tury», 2004 [in Russian].
Mills, C. Blackness Visible: Essays on Philosophy and Race. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998. 
Naj, Dzh. Mjagkaja sila i amerikano-evropejskie otnoshenija [Soft power and US-European relations]// Svobodnaja mysl’-XXI [Free thought-XXI], 2004, 10. [in Russian].
Nestik, T. A. Otnoshenie k vremeni v malyh gruppah i organizacijah [Relation to time in small groups and organizations]. Moskva: Institut psihologii RAN, 2011. [in Russian].
Nevolko, N. N. The Historiographical Review of the Scientific Literature of the Late XIX to the First Decade of the XXI Century Concerning the Problem of Ethnic Identification of the Khakass Ethnos// Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2011, 6 (4), pp. 823-836.
Nye, J., Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. USA: Public Affairs, 2004 [in Russian].

Ortega-i-Gasset, H. Jestetika. Filosofija kul’tury. Moskva, 1991. [In Russian].
Paujels, L. Reprezentiruja dvizhushhujusja kul’turu: problemy i vozmozhnosti antropologicheskoj i sociologicheskoj kinos#emki [Representing a moving culture: the problems and opportunities of anthropological and sociological cinema]. Vizual’naja antropologija: nastrojka optiki [Visual anthropology: adjustment of optics]. Moskva: OOO «Variant», CSPGI, 2009. [in Russian].
Pickering, A. Constructing quarks: a sociological history of particle physics. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 1984.
Pimenova, N. N. Mehanizmy sociokul’turnyh izmenenij korennyh malochislennyh narodov Sibiri i Severa: koncepcija kul’turnoj travmy P. Shtompki [Mechanisms of socio-cultural changes of indigenous small-numbered peoples of Siberia and the North: the concept of cultural trauma P. Shtompki].// Sociodinamika [Sociodynamics], 2016, 3, 37-45. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2016.3.18210. [in Russian].
Pogodaev, N. P. Diskussija o  jazyke opispanija vzaimodejstvija migrantov i  prinimajushhej storony v uslovijah postmoderna [Discussion on the language of the description of the interaction of migrants and the host country in postmodern conditions]. Severnye arhivy i  jekspedicii [Northern archives and expeditions], 2017, 2, pp. 52-72. [In Russian]. 
Reznikova, K. V. Social’noe konstruirovanie obshhenacional’noj identichnosti v Rossijskoj Federacii. Avtoreferat [Social construction of national identity in the Russian Federation. Abstract.]. Krasnojarsk, 2012. [In Russian]. 
Reznikova K.V. Etnichnost’ kak kategorija social’nogo poznanija [Ethnicity as a category of social cognition]. Sociodinamika [Sociodynamics], 2015, 1, 01-111. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2015.1.14228. [In Russian]. 
Reznikova, K. V. K  voprosu ob jepicheskom kul’turnom nasledii korennyh malochislennyh narodov Krasnojarskogo kraja. Litera [On the issue of the epic cultural heritage of the indigenous small-num-bered peoples of the Krasnoyarsk Territory. Literature], 2016, 2, pp. 20-34. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8698.2016.2.18917. [In Russian]. 
Reznikova, K. V. Sovremennoe sostojanie sel’kupov Krasnojarskogo kraja: po materialam polevyh issledovanij [The current state of the Selkup in the Krasnoyarsk Territory: based on field research]. 
Severnye arhivy i jekspedicii [Northern archives and expeditions], 2017, 1, pp. 27-40. [In Russian]. 22

Сибирский антропологический журнал 2 (2017 09) 6-23
Reznikova, K. V., Pimenova, N. N., Kistova, A. V., Seredkina, N. N., Zamaraeva, Ju.S. Upravlenie 
brendingom sibirskoj territorii v svete “novogo regionalizma” [Management of branding of Sibe-
rian territory in the light of the “new regionalism”]. Sociodinamika [Sociodynamics]. 2016, 1, pp. 
137-161. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2016.1.17395. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pr/article_17395.html 
[In Russian]. 

Ritzer, G. Paradigm Analysis in Sociology: Clarifying the Issues. American Sociological Rexiew, 1981, 46 (2), pp. 245-248.
Romanov, P. V., Jarskaja-Smirnova E.R. Social’noe konstruirovanie invalidnosti. – Politika invalidnosti: Social’noe grazhdanstvo invalidov v sovremennoj Rossii. [Social construction of disability. – Disability policy: Social citizenship of disabled people in modern Russia. Saratov, “The Scientific Book”]. Saratov: «Nauchnaja kniga», 2006 [in Russian]. 
Rutkevich, E. D. Bella Robert Nili; Berger Piter Ljudvig; Vah Ioahim; Glok Charl’z; Grili Jendrju Mjet’ju; Koks Harvi; Le Bra Gabrijel’; Lukman Tomas; Nisbet Robert; Olport Gordon; Rismen Djevid; Tokvil’ o  religii; Shlejermaher Fridrih. V: Kul’turologija. Jenciklopedija [Culturology. Encyclopedia] v 2 t. 
Centr gumanitarnyh nauchno-informacionnyh issledovanij Instituta nauchnoj informacii po obshhestvennym naukam Rossijskoj akademii nauk [Center for Humanitarian Scientific and Information Research of the Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. Moskva: ROSSPJeN, 2007 [in Russian]. 
Rutkevich, E. D. Piter Berger – polveka tvorcheskogo puti [Peter Berger – half a century of creativity].// SOCIS (Sociologicheskie issledovanija [Sociological research]), 2011, 1, 114-123. [in Russian]. 
Sartr, Zh.P. Jekzistencializm – jeto gumanizm. Sumerki bogov [Existentialism is humanism. Twilight of the Gods]. Moskva, 1989, pp. 323-328. [in Russian]. 
Sertakova, E. A. Vozmozhnosti HRAF (Jel’skij universitet) dlja kross-kul’turnogo issledovanija korennyh narodov Severa Krasnojarskogo kraja. Kul’tura korennyh i malochislennyh narodov Severa v uslovijah global’nyh transformacij [Possibilities of the KRAF (Yale University) for a cross-cultural study of the indigenous peoples of the North of the Krasnoyarsk Territory. Culture of indigenous and small peoples of the North in conditions of global transformations]. Sankt-Peterburg: Jejdos, 2011 [in Russian]. 
Sitnikova, A. A. Koncept «sever» v  tvorchestve Rokujella Kenta. Chelovek i  kul’tura [The concept of “north” in the work of Rockwell Kent. Man and culture], 2014, 2, pp. 1-27. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2014.2.11550. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/ca/article_11550.html [in Russian]. 
Sitnikova, A. A. The Image of Siberia in Soviet, Post-Soviet Fiction and Werner Herzog’s Documentary Films.// Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2017, 4 (8), pp. 677-706.
Sociokul’turnyj analiz i razvitie territorii Rossii: problemy i reshenija [Sociocultural analysis and development of the territory of Russia: problems and solutions]. Moskva: FORUM, 2012 [in Russian]. 
Utehin, I. Chto takoe vizual’naja antropologija? Otkrytaja biblioteka videolekcija, Evropejskij universitet v Sankt-Peterburge [What is visual anthropology? Open library video lecture, European University in St. Petersburg] [in Russian]. 
Vagner, A. Religioznaja identichnost’ v uslovijah mezhkul’turnoj kommunikacii i globalizacii. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing [Religioznaja identichnost ‘v uslovijah mezhkul’turnoj kommunikacii i globalizacii]. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2011 [in Russian]. 
Vapler, V.Ja., Gronskaja, N.Je., Gusev, A. S., Korshunov, D. S., Makarychev, A. S., Solncev, A. V. Ideja imperii i «mjagkaja sila»: mirovoj opyt i  rossijskie perspektivy [The idea of the empire and «soft power»: world experience and Russian perspectives]. // Voprosy upravlenija [Management issues], 2010, 1 (10) [in Russian]. 
Vizual’naja antropologija: gorodskie karty pamjati [Management issues]. Moskva, OOO «Variant», CSPGI, 2009 [in Russian]. 23
Voropaj, T. Identichnost’ v social’noj antropologii Duglasa Kellnera [Identity in social anthropology by Douglas Kellner]. // Sociologija: teorija, metody, marketing [Sociologija: teorija, metody, marketing], 2000, 2, pp. 43-50 [In Russian].
Weiser, J. PhotoTherapy Techniques in Counselling and Therapy — Using Ordinary Snapshots and Photo-Interactions to Help Clients Heal their Lives. // The Canadian Art Therapy Association Journal, 2004, 17 (2), pp. 23-53. 
Zaharova, N.Ju. Fotografija kak ob’ekt sociologicheskogo analiza [Photography as an object of so-
ciological analysis].// Zhurnal sociologii i social’noj antropologii [Journal of Sociology and Social 
Anthropology], 2008, 1, pp. 147-161. [in Russian].
Zamaraeva, Ju.S. Osobennosti sociokul’turnyh transformacij migracionnyh processov v XX – nach. XXI vv. (na primere krasnojarskogo kraja) [Features of sociocultural transformations of migration processes in the XX – beginning XXI. (On the example of the Krasnoyarsk Territory)]. //Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija [Modern problems of science and education], 2014, 2, 649. [in Russian].
Zamaraeva, Ju.S. Phenomenological Description of Classical Music as an Ethnos-Forming Element of Yakut Culture. //Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2015, 4 (8), pp. 707-721. [in Russian]. 

​

​

Интеграция этнографического подхода 
и «понимающей герменевтики» как 
методологическая стратегия конструирования 
социальных идентичностей

Кистова Анастасия Викторовна
 
Красноярский художественный музей 
им. В. И. Сурикова

Аннотация
Рассматриваются основные этапы развития мировой этнографии. Исследуется специфика каждого этапа, историческая специфика этнографического метода. Исторический период этнографии включает главные теории, методологические открытия. В контексте этнографии исследуется герменевтический метод, анализируются основные создатели герменевтического метода. 
На основании культурных исследований К. Гиртца, В. Дильтея, современных антропологических теорий разрабатывается методологическая стратеия для исследования конструирования социальных идентичностей. Выдвигается гипотеза, что данная методологическая стратегия может быть применена для анализа произведений изобразительного искусства.

Ключевые слова: этнографический метод, герменевтика, социальные идентичности, методологическая стратегия

Integration of Ethnographic Approach and 
Understanding Hermeneutics as a Methodological 
Strategy of Social Identities Modelling

Kistova Anastasiia Viktorovna
Krasnoyarsk V. I. Sukirov Art Museum

Abstract
The article discusses main stages of world ethnography development. It studies specific characteristics of each stage, historical specificity of an ethnographic method. Historical period of ethnography implies main theories, methodological findings. A hermeneutical method is analyzed from the ethnographic point of view; main creators of this method are reviewed. 
Basing on cultural studies of C. Geertz and W. Dilthey, as well as contemporary anthropological theories, a methodological strategy for studying ways of modelling social identities is being developed. The hypotheses that this methodology is applicable to visual art objects analysis is put forward. 

Key words: ethnographic method, hermeneutics, social identities, methodological strategy

​

​

References
Anuchin, D. N. Geologicheskoe proshloe i geograficheskoe nastojashhee Moskvy. Moskva v zerkale  vekov [The geological past and geographical present of Moscow. Moscow in the mirror of centuries]. Moskva: AST; Astrel’, 2007, pp. 3-30. [in Russian].
Arutjunjan, Ju.V. Ob etnicheskih komponentah rossijskoj identichnosti. //Sociologicheskie issledovanija  [The ethnic components of Russian identity. Sociological research], 2009, 6, pp. 38-44. [in Russian].
Bahtin, M. M. Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaja kul’tura Renessansa i Srednevekov’ja [Creativity Francois Rabelais and the national culture of the Renaissance and the Middle Ages]. Moskva, 1965 [in Russian]. 
Bart, R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Pojetika [Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics]. Moskva: Progress; Univers,1994. [in Russian].
Bart, F. Jetnicheskie gruppy i  social’nye granicy. Social’naja organizacija kul’turnyh razlichij [Ethnic groups and social boundaries. Social organization of cultural differences]. Moskva:Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2006. [in Russian].
Berger, P., Lukman, T. Social’noe konstruirovanie real’nosti. Traktat po sociologii znanija [Social construction of reality. A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge]. Moskva:Medium,1995. [in Russian].
Berezhnova, M. I., Pimenova, N. N. Migracija kak sredstvo razvitija territorii: istoricheskij primer Kolymskogo kraja [Migration as a means of developing the territory: a historical example of the Kolyma Region]. // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija [Modern problems of science and education], 2015, 1-1, P. 1886. [in Russian].
Bodrijjar, Zh. K kritike politicheskoj jekonomii znaka [To criticism of the political economy of the mark]. Moskva:Akademicheskij Proekt, 2007. [in Russian].
Bromlej, Ju. V. Jetnosocial’nye processy: teorija, istorija, sovremennost’ [Ethnosocial processes: theory, history, modernity]. Moskva:Nauka, 1987. [in Russian].
Bromlej, Ju. V. Ocherki teorii jetnosa [Essays of the theory of ethnos]. Moskva:izdatel’stvo LKI, 2008. [in Russian].
Bukova M.I. Osobennosti jetnokul’turnogo samosoznanija jetnicheskoj gruppy chulymcev, kompaktno prozhivajushhih na territorii derevni Pasechnoe Tjuhtetskogo rajona Krasnojarskogo kraja (Central’naja Sibir’) [Features of ethnocultural identity of the ethnic group of Chulymians, compactly residing in the village of Pasechnoye of the Tyukhtetsky District of the Krasnoyarsk Territory (Central Siberia)]. Sociodinamika [Sociodynamics], 2016, 4, 41-51. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2016.4.18414. 
URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pr/article_18414.html [in Russian].
Denzin, N. K., Linkoln, Y. S. Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. London, Thousand Oaks, 2005, pp.1-32. 
Derrida, Zh. Polja filosofii [Fields of philosophy]. Moskva:Akademicheskij proekt,2012. [in Russian].

Dil’tej, V. Opisatel’naja psihologija [Descriptive psychology]. Sankt-Peterburg: Aletejja ,1996. [in Russian].
Dil’tej, V. Sobranie sochinenij [Collected Works]. Moskva:Tri kvadrata,2000. [in Russian].
Drobizheva, L. M. Rossijskaja i jetnicheskaja identichnost’: protivostojanie ili sovmestimost’. Rossija reformirujushhajasja [Russian and ethnic identity: confrontation or compatibility. Russia is reforming]. Moskva:Academia, 2002, pp. 213-244.
Frank, S. L. Dusha Cheloveka. Opyt vvedenija v filosofskuju psihologiju [The Soul of Man. The experience of introducing philosophical psychology]. Moskva, 1917. [in Russian].
Fuko, M. Slova i veshhi. Arheologija gumanitarnyh nauk [Words and things. Archeology of the Humanities]. Sankt-Peterburg, A-cad ,1994. [in Russian].
Gadamer, G.-G Istina i metod [Truth and method]. Moskva:Progress,1988. [in Russian].
Girc, K. «Nasyshhennoe opisanie»: v  poiskah interpretativnoj teorii kul’tury. Antologija issledovanij 
kul’tury. Interpretacija kul’tury [“Saturated description”: in search of an interpretive theory of culture. Anthology of cultural studies. Interpretation of culture]. Sankt-Peterburg, Universitetskaja kniga, 1997, pp.171- 203. [in Russian].
Girc., K. Interpretacija kul’tur [interpretation of culture]. Moskva: ROSPJeN, 2004. [in Russian].
Godel’e, M. Zagadka dara [The Gift Riddle]. Moskva: Vostochnaja literatura, 2007. [in Russian].
Grejmas, A. Zh. Strukturnaja semantika: poisk metoda [Structural semantics: the search for a method]. 
Moskva:Akademicheskij proekt., 2004. [in Russian].
Gumilev, L. N. Jetnogenez i biosfera Zemli [Ethnogenesis and the biosphere of the Earth]. Moskva:DI-DIK ,1993. [in Russian].
Gumilev, L. N. Jetnosfera: Istorija ljudej i istorija prirody [Ethnosphere: History of people and the history of nature]. Moskva:Mysl’,1999. [in Russian].Сибирский антропологический журнал 2 (2017 09) 24-4036
Gusserl’, Je. Logicheskie issledovanija [Logical research]. Moskva: Gnozis, Dom intellektual’noj knigi, 2001. [in Russian].
Hajdegger, M. Vremja i bytie [Time and Being]. Moskva:Respublika,1993. [in Russian].
Ilbeykina, M. I., Kolesnik, M. A., Libakova, N. M., Sertakova, E. A., Sitnikova, A. A. Innovation And Personality: A Study of Attitude to Innovation Among Krasnoyarsk Students and Business Experts Using The Basadur-hausdorff Method. //Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2015, 6 (6 S7), pp. 282-288.
Ivanov, Vjach. Vs. Ot bukvy i sloga k ieroglifu: sistemy pis’ma v prostranstve i vremeni [From letter and syllable to hieroglyph: writing systems in space and time]. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury, 2013. [in Russian].
Jakobson, R. O. Teksty, dokumenty, issledovanija [Texts, documents, studies]. Moskva:RGGU,1999. [in Russian].
Jarskaja-Smirnova, E. R. Narrativnyj analiz v sociologii [Narrative analysis in sociology]. // Sociologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological journal],1997, 3, pp. 38-61. [in Russian].
Jaspers, K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii [Meaning and purpose of history]. Moskva:Respublika,1994. [in Russian].
Jeko, U. Otsutstvujushhaja struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiju [Missing structure. Introduction to Semiology]. Sankt-Peterburg, Simpozium,2006. [in Russian].
Kavelin, K. D. Sobranie sochinenij [Collected Works]. Sankt-Peterburg, tipografija M. M. Stasjulevicha, 1897. [in Russian].
Kirko, V. I., Keush, A. V. The Model of the Regional Innovative Platform of the Autonomic Educational Institution on the Example of the Siberian Federal University. // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2011, 1 (4), pp. 90-101.
Kirko, V. I., Malakhova, E. V., Pack, N. I. Education for the future: new strategies of distance education for the universities of Eastern Siberia. // Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 2014, 15 (4), pp. 23-33.
Kistova, A. V., Pimenova, N. N. History and Specificity of Literary Activity of Indigenous Peoples. // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 9 (9), 2016, pp.1932-1944.
Kistova, A. V., Tamarovskaja, A. N. Proizvedenija arhitektury i kul’turnaja identichnost’ [Works of architecture and cultural identity]. // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija [Modern problems of science and education], 2014, 4, P. 597. [in Russian].
Kistova, A. V., Tamarovskaja, A.N Architectural Space as a Factor of Regional Cultural Identity. // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2015, 4 (8), pp.735-749.
Kolesnik, M. A. Decoration of Children’s Literature of the Indigenous Peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East. // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2016, 9 (9), pp. 2044-2059.
Koptseva, N. P., Kirko, V. I. Specificity of ethnogeny indigenous peoples by Central Siberia in the transition from the traditional type of society to modern society. // Life Sci J ,201411(7), pp.409-413.
Koptseva, N. P., Kirko, V. I. Modern specificity of legal regulation of Cultural Development of the Indigenous Peoples of the Arctic Siberia under the global transformations. // Life Sci J, 2014, 11(9), pp. 314-319.
Kopceva, N. P., Luzan, V. S. Gosudarstvennaja kul’turnaja politika v  Sibirskom federal’nom okruge: koncepcii, problemy, issledovanija [State Cultural Policy in the Siberian Federal District: Concepts, Problems, Research]. Krasnojarsk: Sibirskij federal’nyj universitet, 2012 [in Russian].
Kopceva, N. P., Pimenova, N. N., Luzan, V. S., Semenova, A. A., Sertakova, E. A., Bahova N.A Eth-
no-Formative Mechanisms and Forms of Self-Awareness of Indigenous Peoples Under Conditions of External Civilization Pressure (by an Example of the Yakut Ethnic Group). // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2012, 7 (5), pp. 988-1004.
Kovalevskij, M. M. Jekonomicheskij stroj Rossii [The economic system of Russia]. Moskva:izdatel’stvo Ermolaevoj,1900. [in Russian].
Kristeva, Ju. Izbrannye trudy: Razrushenie pojetiki [Selected Works: Destruction of Poetics]. Moskva:ROSSPJeN, 2004. [in Russian].
Leturno, Sh. Sociologija po dannym jetnografii [Sociology based on ethnography]. Moskva:KomKniga, 2010. [in Russian].
Levi-Stross, K. Strukturnaja antropologija [Structural anthropology]. Moskva:Jeksmo,2001. [in Russian].
Libakova, N. M. Social’no-psihologicheskie osobennosti formirovanija gendernyh obrazov v  srede rossijskogo studenchestva (rezul’taty associativnogo jeksperimenta) [Socio-psychological features of the formation of gender images among Russian students (the results of an associative experiment)]. // Sociodinamika [Sociodynamics],2014 (10), pp.101-134. [in Russian].
Libakova, N. M., Sertakova, E. A. Kul’turologicheskoe issledovanie korennyh malochislennyh narodov Krasnojasrkogo kraja: rezul’taty jekspertnogo interv’ju [Culturological study of indigenous small peoples of the Krasnaya SSR region: the results of an expert interview]. // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija [Modern problems of science and education], 2014, 4, pp. 598. [in Russian].
Libakova, N. M., Sertakova, E. A. Formation of Ethnic Identiy of the Indigenous Peoples of the North in Arts and Crafts on the Example of Bone Carving. // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2015, 4 (8), pp. 750-768.
Libakova, N. M., Kopceva, N. P. Native Culture of the ,19th – ,20th Centuries in Search After Truth. Truth of Real Human Being in Vladimir Solovyov’s Philosophy of the Universal Unity and Works of Art in the Russian Painting. // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2009, 1 (2), pp. 67-83. 
Libakova, N. M., Sertakova, E. A., Kolesnik, M. A., Sitnikova, A. A., Il’bejkina, M.I Sovremennye strategii social’nogo pozicionirovanija sibirskih regionov [Modern strategies for social positioning of Siberian regions]. // Sociodinamika [Sociodynamics],20161, pp.162-189. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2016.1.17420. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pr/article_17420.html [in Russian].
Lihachev, D. S. Razdum’ja o Rossii [Thinking about Russia]. Moskva:Logos,1999. [in Russian].
Losev, A. F. Filosofija. Mifologija. Kul’tura [Philosophy. Mythology. Culture]. Moskva:Politizdat,1991. [in Russian].
Lotman, Ju.M., Uspenskij, B. A. O semioticheskom mehanizme kul’tury. Semiosfera [On the semiotic mechanism of culture. Semiosphere]. Sankt-Peterburg: Iskusstvo, 2000. [in Russian].
Lur’e, S.V. Istoricheskaja jetnologija [Historical Ethnology]. Moskva:Akademicheskij proekt, 2004. [in Russian].
Malahov, V. S. Simvolicheskoe proizvodstvo jetnichnosti i konflikt. Jazyk i jetnicheskij konflikt [Symbolic production of ethnicity and conflict. Language and ethnic conflict]. Moskva:Gendal’f,2001. [in Russian].
Malinovskij, B. Nauchnaja teorija kul’tury [Scientific theory of culture]. Moskva: OGI,2005. [in Russian].
Minc, Z. G. Pojetika russkogo simvolizma [Poetics of Russian Symbolism]. Sankt-Peterburg, Iskusstvo, 2004. [in Russian].
Morgan, L. G. Drevnee obshhestvo, ili Issledovanie linij chelovecheskogo progressa ot dikosti cherez varvarstvo k civilizacii [Ancient society, or Study of the lines of human progress from savagery through barbarism to civilization]. Leningrad, izdatel’stvo instituta narodov Severa,1935. [in Russian].
Moskaljuk, M. V., Kistova, A. V., Sertakova, E. A. Sovremennyj marketing hudozhestvennogo muzeja (regional’naja specifika) [Modern marketing of an art museum (regional specificity)]. // Teoreticheskaja i prikladnaja jekonomika [Theoretical and Applied Economics] ,2016, 4, pp.13-26. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8647.2016.4.20963. [in Russian].
Nevolko, N. N. The Historiographical Review of the Scientific Literature of the Late XIX to the First Deade of the XXI Century Concerning the Problem of Ethnic Identification of the Khakass Ethnos. // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2016 (4), pp. 823-836.
Nevol’ko, N.N. The Visualization of Ethnic Theme in the Khakass Artists’ Paintings and Graphic Works of Art, // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences,2011, 8 (4), pp.1109-1126. 
Oshhepkova, E. S. Jetnicheskaja identichnost’ kak sostavljajushhaja obraza strany [Ethnic identity as 
a component of the image of the country]. // Vestnik MGOU,2012, 1 (7), pp.76-81. [in Russian].
Pimenova, N. N. Mehanizmy sociokul’turnyh izmenenij korennyh malochislennyh narodov Sibiri i Severa: koncepcija kul’turnoj travmy P. Shtompki [Mechanisms of sociocultural changes of indigenous small-numbered peoples of Siberia and the North: the concept of cultural trauma P. Sztompki]// Sociodinamika [Sociodynamics],2016, 3, pp.37-45. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2016.3.18210. [in Russian].
Pimenova, N. N., Marysheva, A. V. Wooden Zodchestvo of Krasnoyarsk City as the Space for Forming Territorial and Ethno-Cultural Identity. // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences,2011, 12 (4), pp.1784-1793.
Pirs, Ch.S. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedenija [Selected philosophical works]. Moskva:Logos,2000. [in Russian].
Propp, V.Ja. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoj skazki [Historical roots of a fairy tale]. Leningrad, izdatel’stvo LGU,1986. [in Russian].
Razumovskaya, V. A. Siberia in the Mirror of Other Cultures: Literature and Translation. // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences,2015, 12 (8), pp.2939-2946. [in Russian].
Razumovskaja V.A. Semantika hudozhestvennogo obraza v originale i perevode: kot Begemot [Semantics of the artistic image in the original and translation: the cat Hippo]. Problemy istorii, filologii, kul’tury [Problems of History, Philology, Culture],2012, 3, pp.268. [in Russian].
Razumovskaya, V. A. Commodification of Foreign Languages in the Educational Space of Modern Russia. // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences,2015, 11 (8), pp.2596-2605. [in Russian].
Revzin, I. I. Struktura jazyka kak modelirujushhej sistemy [The structure of language as a modeling system]. Moskva:Nauka,1978. [in Russian].
Reznikova, K. V. Immigracionnaja politika zarubezhnyh stran: poisk priemlemyh modelej dlja Rossii [Immigration policy of foreign countries: the search for acceptable models for Russia]. // Sovremennye problemy nauki i  obrazovanija [Modern problems of science and education],2014, 2, pp.650. [in Russian].
Reznikova, K. V. K voprosu ob jepicheskom kul’turnom nasledii korennyh malochislennyh narodov Krasnojarskogo kraja [On the issue of the epic cultural heritage of the indigenous small-numbered peoples of the Krasnoyarsk Territory]. // Litera, 2,2016,20-34. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8698.2016.2.18917. [in Russian]. 
Reznikova, K. V. Social’noe konstruirovanie obshhenacional’noj identichnosti v  Rossijskoj Federacii [Social Construction of a National Identity in the Russian Federation]. Avtoreferat. Krasnojarsk, Sibirskij federal’nyj universitet,2012. [in Russian].
Riker, P. Konflikt interpretacij. Ocherki o germenevtike [Conflict of interpretations. Essays on hermeneutics]. Moskva:Medium,1995. [in Russian].
Rjedkliff-Braun, A. R. Metod v social’noj antropologii [Method in social anthropology]. Moskva:KanonPress–C. ,2001 [in Russian].
Romanov, P. V. Procedury strategii, podhody «social’noj jetnografii» [Procedures of the strategy, approaches to “social ethnography”], // Sociologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological journal], ,1996№ 3/4, pp.138-149. [in Russian]. 
Romanov, P. V., Smirnova-Jarskaja, E. R. «Delat’ znakomoe neizvestnym...»: jetnograficheskij metod v sociologii [“Making a familiar unknown ...”: an ethnographic method in sociology]. // Sociologicheskij zhurnal [Sociological journal],1998, 1-2, pp.145-160. [in Russian].
Rozanov, V. V. O ponimanii [About Understanding]. Moskva:Tanais,1995. [in Russian].
Semenova, A. A. Modifikacii drevnerusskogo koncepta «gosudarstvo» v  rossijskoj kul’ture XXI veka: metodologicheskij aspect [Modifications of the Old Russian concept “state” in the Russian culture of the XIII century: the methodological aspect]. Avtoreferat. Krasnojarsk,2009. [in Russian].
Shahbanova, M. M. Jetnicheskoe samosoznanie i jetnicheskaja identichnost’: sovremennye koncepcii issledovanija [Ethnic identity and ethnic identity: modern research concepts]. // Vestnik instituta IAJe, 1,2013. [in Russian].
Shhedrovickij, G. P. Izbrannye Trudy [Selected Works]. Moskva:Shkola kul’turnoj politiki,1995. [in Russian].
Shirokogorov, S. M. Izbrannye raboty i materialy [Selected works and materials]. Vladivostok, izdatel’stvo Dal’nevostochnogo universiteta,2001. [in Russian].
Shirokogorov, S. M. Mesto jetnografii sredi nauk i  klassifikacija jetnosov [The place of ethnography among the sciences and the classification of ethnic groups]. http://www.shirokogorov.ru. [in Russian]. 
Shjuc, A. Izbrannoe: mir, svetjashhijsja smyslom [Favorites: the world, glowing with meaning]. Moskva:ROSSPJeN,2004. [in Russian].
Shlejermaher, F. Germenevtika [Hermeneutics]. Sankt-Peterburg, Evropejskij dom. [in Russian].
Shpet, G. G. Germenevtika i ee problem [Hermeneutics and its problems]. Kontekst. Moskva,1989. [in Russian].
Shpet, G.G . Vvedenie v jetnicheskuju psihologiju. Psihologija social’nogo bytija [introduction to ethnic psychology. Psychology of social life]. Moskva:Institut prakticheskoj psihologii; Voronezh: MOD-JeK,1996, pp. 261-372. [in Russian].
Shternberg, L.Ja. Pervobytnaja religija v svete jetnografii [Primitive religion in the light of ethnography]. Moskva:Librokom,2012. [in Russian].
Semenova, A. A., Gerasimova, A.A Osobennosti tvorcheskogo metoda Sergeja Anufrieva [Features of the creative method of Sergei Anufriev]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija [Modern problems of science and education],2013 2, 542. [in Russian].
Seredkina, N. N. Teoreticheskaja model’ pozitivnoj jetnicheskoj identichnosti i mehanizmy ee formirovanija [The Theoretical Model of a Positive Ethnic Identity and the Mechanisms of its Formation].// Sociodinamika [Sociodynamics],2016, 2, pp.37-46. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2016.2.17690. [in Russian].
Sertakova, E. A., Gerasimova, A.A Obraz goroda Krasnojarska v ksilografii i problema regional’noj identichnosti [The image of the city of Krasnoyarsk in woodcuts and the problem of regional identity]. // Urbanistika [Urbanistics], 2015, 2, pp.89-99. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2015.2.16355 [in Russian].
Sertakova, E. A., Zamaraeva, Ju.S., Sitnikova, A.A Sociologicheskoe issledovanie kul’turnyh potrebnostej zhitelej goroda Krasnojarska [Sociological study of cultural needs of Krasnoyarsk residents]., Urbanistika [Urbanistics], 2015, 3, pp.16-42. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2015.3.16495. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/urb/article_16495.html [in Russian].
Sitnikova, A. A. Koncept «sever» v  tvorchestve Rokujella Kenta [The concept of “north” in the work of Rockwell Kent]. Chelovek i kul’tura [Man and culture], 2014, 2, pp.1-27. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2014.2.11550. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/ca/article_11550.html [in Russian].
Sitnikova, A. A. The Image of Siberia in Soviet, Post-Soviet Fiction and Werner Herzog’s Documentary Films. // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences,2017, 4 (8), pp. 677-706.
Sokolovskij, S. V. Jetnografija: stil’, zhanr i metod (o stat’e S.N. Abashina «Svoj sredi chuzhih, chuzhoj sredi svoih») [Ethnography: style, genre and method (on the article of SN Abashin “His own among strangers, a  stranger among his own”)].// Jetnograficheskoe obozrenie [Ethnographic Review], 2003, 2. [in Russian].
Sossjur, F. de Kurs obshhej lingvistiki [Course of General Linguistics]. Moskva:Editorial URSS,2004. [in Russian].
Sovakov, B. N. Principial’nye osnovy germenevtiki hudozhestvennogo teksta [Principal foundations of  hermeneutics of the literary text]. Kaluga, Rossijskaja pravovaja akademija. Kaluzhskij filial, 2005. [in Russian].
Spenser G. Osnovanija sociologii: Dannye sociologii. Indukcija sociologii [The foundations of sociology: The data of sociology. Induction of Sociology]. Moskva:Librokom,2013. [in Russian].
Strauss, A., Korbin, Dzh. Osnovy kachestvennogo issledovanija: obosnovannaja teorija, procedury i tehniki [Basics of qualitative research: sound theory, procedures and techniques]. Moskva:Jeditorial URSS,2001 [in Russian].
Susokolov, A. A. Russkij jetnos v XX v.: etapy krizisa jekstensivnoj kul’tury (gipotezy jetnojekologicheskoj modeli) [Russian ethnos in the twentieth century: stages of the crisis of extensive culture (hypotheses of the ethnoecological model)]. // Mir Rossii,1994, 3(2), pp. 3-53. [in Russian].
Tajlor, Je.B. Pervobytnaja kul’tura [Primitive culture]. Moskva: Oniks,1997. [in Russian].
Tishkov, V.A.O fenomene jetnichnosti [On the phenomenon of ethnicity]. // Jetnograficheskoe obozrenie [Ethnographic Review],. ,2011, 3, pp.3-21. [in Russian].
Todorov, C. Teorii simvola [Symbol Theory]. Moskva:Dom intellektual’noj knigi. 1999 [in Russian].
Tokarev, S. A. Istoki jetnograficheskoj nauki: do serediny 19 veka [The origins of ethnographic science: until the middle of the 19th century]. Moskva:Nauka,1978. [in Russian].
Tokarev, S. A. Izbrannoe. Teoreticheskie i istoriograficheskie stat’i po jetnografii i religijam narodov mira [Selected. Theoretical and historiographical articles on ethnography and religions of the peoples of the world]. Moskva:Nauka. 1999 [in Russian].
Toporov, V. N. Mif. Ritual. Simvol. Obraz. Issledovanija v oblasti mifopojeticheskogo [Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Form. Research in the field of mythopoetic]. Moskva:Progress-Kul’tura,1995. [in Russian].
Turnval’d. R. Chelovecheskoe obshhestvo v svoem jetnosociologicheskom osnovanii [Human society in its ethnosociological basis]. Berlin,1931. [in Russian].
Uspenskij, B. A. Semiotika istorii. Semiotika kul’tury [The semiotics of history. Semiotics of culture]. Moskva:Gnozis,1994. [in Russian].
Vajc, T. Antropologija pervobytnyh narodov [Anthropology of primitive peoples]. Moskva:Tipografіja A.I. Mamontova, 1867. [in Russian].
Veber, M. Izbrannoe. Obraz obshhestva [Selected. Image of society]. Moskva: Jurist, 1994.
Zamaraeva, Ju.S. Osobennosti sociokul’turnyh transformacij migracionnyh processov v XX – nach. XXI vv. (na primere krasnojarskogo kraja) [Features of sociocultural transformations of migration processes in the XX – beginning XXI cc. (On the example of the Krasnoyarsk Territory)]. // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija [Modern problems of science and education], 2014, 2, pp.649. [in Russian].
Zhukovskij, V.I Teorija izobrazitel’nogo iskusstva [Theory of Fine Arts]. Sankt-Peterburg, Aletejja, 2011 [in Russian].
Zhukovskij, V. I., Pivovarov, D. V. The Nature of Visual Thinking. // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 2008, 1 (1), pp. 149-158. [in Russian]. 

​

Динамика этнических процессов у кетов 
в конце ХХ – начале XXI века

Кривоногов Виктор Павлович

Сибирский федеральный университет

Аннотация:

В 1991, 2001 и 2014 годах автором проведены по единой программе три этнографических исследований среди кетов, включающих массовый опрос со 100-процентным охватом. Опрос позволил с высокой точностью показать основные направления у кетов протекающих этнических процессов. Показаны изменения в численности, в языковых процессах, в национально-смешанной брачности. Основной вывод: кеты быстро превращаются в группу русскоязычных метисов, но с устойчивым этническим самосознанием. 

Ключевые слова: Кеты, современные этнические процессы, этноязыковые процессы, национально-смешанные браки, ассимиляция

Dynamics of Kets’ Ethnic Processes at the Turn  
of 20th Century.

​

Krivonogov Victor Pavlovich 

 Siberian Federal University

Abstract: 

In 1991, 2001 and 2004, the author made a unified program for ethnographic studies among Kets, which implied mass survey with 100 % coverage. The survey demonstrated the directions of Kets’ ethnic processes with high precision. The article presents changes in population, language processes, and the number of international marriages. The main conclusion: Kets rapidly turn into a group of Russian-speaking metis, however, with steady ethnic consciousness. 

Key words:  kets, contemporary ethnic processes, ethnolinguistic process, international marriages, assimilation

​

Список литературы

Krivonogov, V. P. Kety na poroge III tysyacheletiya [Cathy at the threshold of the third millennium]. Krasnoyarsk, 1998. [in Russian]. 
Krivonogov, V. P. Kety: Desyat’ let spustya [Cathy: Ten Years Later]. 1991-2001.[in Russian].
Krivonogov, V. P. Sovremennye etnicheskie protsessy u  surgutikhinskikh i  pakulikhinskikh ketov [Modern ethnic processes in the Surgutikhin and Pakulikhin Kets] // Narody Sibiri i sopredel’nykh territoriy [Peoples of Siberia and adjacent territories]. Tomsk, 1995.[in Russian]. 
Krivonogov, V. P. Etnicheskie protsessy u ketov [Ethnic processes in Kets] \\ Rossiya: Issledovaniya po sotsial’no-politicheskoy istorii, istoriografii i demografii [Russia: Studies on Socio-Political History, Historiography and Demography]. Krasnoyarsk, 1999.[in Russian]. 
Alekseenko, E. A. Etnicheskie protsessy na Turukhanskom Severe [Ethnic processes in the Turukhansk North] // Preobrazovaniya v khozyaystve i kul’ture i etnicheskie protsessy u narodov Severa [Transformations in economy and culture and ethnic processes among the peoples of the North]. Moskow, 1970. P. 77. [in Russian]. 

​

Отношение к религии студенческой молодежи 
города Красноярска

Соколов Евгений Максимилианович,

​

Научный руководитель
Середкина Наталья Николаевна
Сибирский федеральный университет

Аннотация 
В современном поликонфессиональном мире важно учитывать религиозное мировоззрение людей, проживающих вместе на одной территории, но исповедующих различную веру. Одной из тех социальных групп, определяющих настроение общества не только сегодняшнего дня, но и ближайшего будущего, является студенческая молодежь. Выявление особенностей отношения студенческой молодежи города Красноярска к религии составляет цель данного исследования. В  статье приводятся результаты опроса, проведенного в  апреле 2017 года в форме анкетирования. Полученные результаты анализируются с позиции степени приверженности респондентов к религии, их отношения к религиозным движениям, особенностей ближайшего окружения молодых людей на предмет вовлеченности в  религиозную веру. 
Обнаружено, что приверженность студенческой молодежи к религии носит номинальный характер. Интерпретируя полученные ответы, автор приходит к выводу, что молодежь имеет в большей степени внешнюю, произвольную сопричастность к религии, чем внутреннюю личностную потребность в вере. Кроме того, результаты опроса показали, что в реальной жизни респонденты относятся к религии достаточно безразлично, тому подтверждение несоблюдение религиозных традиций, канонов большинством респондентов, отсутствие среди них веры в то, что религия может помочь в жизни, а также отсутствие намерения прививать религию своим детям. Позитивным моментом является то, что большинство респондентов (95 %) относятся толерантно к представителям иных конфессий. Тем не менее, существует небольшая часть молодежи негативно относящихся к представителям других вероисповеданий. 

Ключевые слова: вера, Красноярск, молодежь, религия

​

​

​

​

​

​