top of page

Раздел 2. Теория и история культуры


УДК 316.3


Формирование понятия «сложная идентичность»  в современных гуманитарных науках


Замараева Юлия Сергеевна[1]

Сибирский федеральный университет


В статье раскрыта концептуальная проблематика формирования понятия «сложная идентичность» в современных гуманитарных науках на материале анализа зарубежных и отечественных исследований. В научной истории концептуальное определение понятия состоялось в последней трети XX столетия в социологии и социальной психологии, однако с начала XXI в. свое прикладное развитие получило благодаря междисциплинарным исследованиям, позволившим ученым выявлять сложные формы идентичности в условиях динамично развивающегося мира. В начале XXI века возрос интерес к идентичности как культурной проблеме и обнаружилась необходимость ее изучения в контексте современной культуры и межкультурных отношений. Культурологическая проблематика позволяет соединить существующие представления в концептуальное определение понятия «сложная идентичность» и выстроить приоритеты исследования в соответствии с современными социально-культурными отношениями.


Ключевые слова: теория социальной идентичности, сложная идентичность, природа сложности социальной идентичности

Developing the Term of the Complex Identity in the Modern Humanities

Zamaraeva Yulia Sergeevna1

Siberian Federal University


The article describes the conceptual problem of forming the term of the complex identity in the modern humanities based on the analysis of Russian and foreign researches. In the history of science, the conceptual definition of the term was developed in the last third of the 20th century in sociology and social psychology; however, since the beginning of the 21st century, the term has found an applicable meaning due to the interdisciplinary studies that allowed the researchers to describe complex forms of identity in the dynamically developing world. At the beginning of the 21st century, the interest for identity as a cultural problem increased, therefore creating the need of studying the identity in the context of the modern culture and intercultural relations. The culturological problematics integrate the existing ideas into a conceptual definition of the complex identity term and align the research priorities with the modern sociocultural relations.


Keywords: social identity theory, complex identity, nature of the complexity of the social identity


Научная специальность: 24.00.01 – Теория и история культуры (культурология).



[1] © Zamaraeva Yu.S., 2020. Corresponding author e-mail address:

© Siberian Journal of Anthropology. All rights reserved.


Ashforth, B. E., Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization //Academy of management review, 1989, 14 (1), рр. 20-39.

Barreto M., Ellemers N. The effects of being categorised: The interplay between internal and external social identities //European review of social psychology, 2003, 14 (1), рр. 139-170.

Binning, K. R. et al. The interpretation of multiracial status and its relation to social engagement and psychological well‐being //Journal of Social Issues, 2009, 65 (1), рр. 35-49.

Brewer, M. B., Gardner, Who is this "we"? Levels of collective identity and self representation // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 71, рр. 83-93.

Brewer, M. B., Pierce, K. P. Social identity complexity and outgroup tolerance //Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2005, 31, 3, рр. 428-437.

 Brown R. Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges //European journal of social psychology, 2000, 30 (6), рр. 745-778.

Burmistrova O. N. Vidy organizatsionnoy identifikatsii [Types of organizational identification] // Uchenyye zapiski Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial'nogo universiteta [Scientific notes of the Russian State Social University], 2009, 11, рр. 252-255. [in Russian].

Chang M. X. L. et al. The more (social group memberships), the merrier: Is this the case for Asians? //Frontiers in psychology, 2016, 7, рр. 1001.

Côté J. E., Levine C. G. Identity, formation, agency, and culture: A social psychological synthesis. – Psychology Press, 2014. 268 р.

Crisp, R. J., Hewstone M. Differential evaluation of crossed category groups: Patterns, processes, and reducing intergroup bias //Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1999, 2 (4), рр. 307-333.

Crisp, R. J., Hewstone M., Rubin M. Does multiple categorization reduce intergroup bias? //Personality and social psychology bulletin, 2001, 27 (1), рр. 76-89.

Crisp, R. J., Hewstone, M. Multiple social categorization //Advances in experimental social psychology. 2007, 39, рр. 163-254.

Cross S. E., Gore, J. S., Morris, M. L. The relational-interdependent self-construal, self-concept consistency, and well-being //Journal of personality and social psychology, 2003, 85 (5), рр. 933.

Dukerich, J. M., Roderick, K., Judi, L.P. The dark side of organizational identification // Identity in organizations. building theory through conversation, ed. David A. Whetten, Paul C. Godfrey, 1998, рр. 245–256. 

Ferguson, A. Intersections of identity: Navigating the complexities //Forum on public policy: A journal of the Oxford Round Table. – 2006. URL:

Haslam C. et al. Maintaining group memberships: Social identity continuity predicts well-being after stroke //Neuropsychological rehabilitation, 2008, 18 (5-6), рр. 671-691.

Haslam S. A. et al. The social identity perspective today: The impact of its defining ideas //Rediscovering social identity: Key readings. Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis, 2010.

Haslam, C., Jetten, J., Alexander, S. H. The social cure: Identity, health and well-being. Psychology press, 2012. рр. 237–254.

Haslam, S. A. et al. Social categorization and group homogeneity: Changes in the perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trait favourableness //British Journal of Social Psychology, 1995, 34 (2), рр. 139-160.

Haslam, S. A. et al. Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1999, 25 (7), рр. 809-818.

Haslam, S. A. Psychology in organizations. – Sage, 2004. 336 р.

Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., Platow, M. J. The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. Psychology Press, 2010. 296 р.

Hewstone, M., Islam, M. R., Judd, C. M. Models of crossed categorization and intergroup relations //Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 64 (5), рр. 779.

Hornsey, M. J. Social identity theory and self‐categorization theory: A historical review // Social and personality psychology compass, 2008, 2 (1), рр. 204-222.

Iyer A. et al. The more (and the more compatible) the merrier: Multiple group memberships and identity compatibility as predictors of adjustment after life transitions //British Journal of Social Psychology, 2009, 48 (4), рр. 707-733.

Jenkins, R. Chto zhdet sotsiologiyu: vymiraniye, zastoy ili evolyutsiya?  [What awaits sociology: extinction, stagnation or evolution?] // Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological studies], 2015, 3, р. 11-21. [in Russian].

Jenkins, R. Social identity. Routledge, 2014. 264 р.

Jetten, J. et al. Declining autobiographical memory and the loss of identity: Effects on well-being //Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 2010, 32 (4), рр. 408-416.

Jetten, J. et al. Having a lot of a good thing: Multiple important group memberships as a source of self-esteem //PloS one, 2015, 10 (5).

Jones, J. M. et al. Deciding to disclose: The importance of maintaining social relationships for well-being after acquired brain injury //The social cure: Identity, health and well-being, 2012. рр. 255-271.

Jones, J. M., Jetten, J. Recovering from strain and enduring pain: Multiple group memberships promote resilience in the face of physical challenges //Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2011, 2 (3), рр. 239-244.

Khukhlaev, O. E., Khayt, M. A. Slozhnost' sotsial'noy identichnosti: kontseptsiya S. Rokkas i M. Bryuyer [The complexity of social identity: the concept of S. Rokkas and M. Brewer] // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2012, 3, рр. 16-26. [in Russian].

Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 78, рр. 223-246.

Lipatov, S. A., Lovakov, A. V. Sovremennyye issledovaniya organizatsionnoy identifikatsii v zarubezhnoy psikhologii [Modern studies of organizational identification in foreign psychology] // Natsional'nyy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [National Psychological Journal], 2010, 1. [in Russian].

Macrae C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B. The dissection of selection in person perception: inhibitory processes in social stereotyping //Journal of personality and social psychology, 1995, 69 (3), рр 397-407.

Nesmeyanova, R.K. Sub"yektivnoye predstavleniye o korporativnoy kul'ture i organizatsionnaya identifikatsiya: osobennosti vzaimosvyazi [Subjective idea of corporate culture and organizational identification: features of the relationship] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Seriya 14. Psikhologiya [Moscow University Herald, Series 14. Psychology], 2017, 1, pp. 88-104. [in Russian].

Nesmeyanova, R.K., Lipatov, S.A. Aktual'nyye tendentsii issledovaniya organizatsionnoy identifikatsii v zarubezhnoy psikhologii [Actual trends in the study of organizational identification in foreign psychology] // Chelovecheskiy capital [Human capital], 2018, 1, рр. 60-72. [in Russian].

Nesmeyanova, R.K., Lipatov, S.A. Vzaimosvyaz' vospriyatiya i privlekatel'nosti korporativnoy kul'tury s organizatsionnoy identifikatsiyey sotrudnikov [Interrelation of perception and attractiveness of corporate culture with organizational identification of employees] // Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya [Organizational Psychology], 2017, 7-3, рр. 67-84. [in Russian].

Onorato, R. S., Turner J. C. Fluidity in the self‐concept: the shift from personal to social identity // European journal of social psychology, 2004, 34 (3), рр. 257-278.

Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., Lightdale, J. R. Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups //Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1994, 20 (5), рр. 484-493.

Reynolds, K. J., Turner J. C. Individuality and the prejudiced personality //European review of social psychology, 2006, 17 (1), рр. 233-270.

Roccas, S., Brewer, M. B. Social identity complexity //Personality and social psychology review, 2002, 6 (2), рр. 88-106.

Rothbart, M., John, O. P. Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact //Journal of Social Issues, 1985, 41 (3), рр. 81-104.

Schmid, K. et al. Antecedents and consequences of social identity complexity: Intergroup contact, distinctiveness threat, and outgroup attitudes //Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2009, 35 (8), рр. 1085-1098.

 Sidorenkov A.V., Dorofeev V.A. Sootnosheniye gruppovoy, mikrogruppovoy i mezhlichnostnoy identichnosti rabotnikov v proizvodstvennykh gruppakh [Correlation of group, microgroup and interpersonal identities of workers in production groups] // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2016, 7-3, рр. 60-75. [in Russian].

Sønderlund, A. L., Morton, T. A., Ryan M. K. Multiple group membership and well-being: Is there always strength in numbers? //Frontiers in psychology, 2017, 8, рр. 1038.

Stangor, C., Lynch, L., Duan, C., Glass, B. Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 62, рр. 207-218.

Steffens, N. K. et al. Multiple social identities enhance health post-retirement because they are a basis for giving social support //Frontiers in psychology, 2016, 7, рр. 1519.

Tajfel, H. Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge and Paris. 1982. 546 р.

Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour // Austin, William G.; Worchel, Stephen. Psychology of Intergroup Relations (2nd ed.). Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1986.

Tetlock, P. E. A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 50, рр. 819-827.

Tetlock, P. E. Accountability and complexity of thought // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45, рр. 74-83.

Tronevskaya, M.A. Transformatsiya sotsial'noy identichnosti v usloviyakh krizisa postmodernistskogo obshchestva i kul'tury [The transformation of social identity in a crisis of postmodern society and culture ] // teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya [Theory and practice of social development], 2015, 3, рр. 34-37. [in Russian].

Turner, J. C. et al. Self and collective: Cognition and social context // Personality and social psychology bulletin, 1994, 20 (5), рр. 454-463.

Turner, J. C. Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories //Social identity: Context, commitment, content, 1999, 3 (1), рр. 6-34.

Turner, J. C., Tajfel, H. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of intergroup relations.  Chicago, 1986. рр. 276-293

Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., Wetherell, M. S. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell, 1987.

Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J. The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence //British Journal of Social Psychology. – 1986., 25 (3), рр. 237-252.

Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A.,  McGarty, C. Self and collective: Cognition and social context // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1994, 20 (5), рр. 454-463.

Turner, J. C., Onorato, R. S. Social identity, personality, and the self-concept: A self-categorization perspective // The Psychology of the Social Self, 1998, рр. 11–46.

Urban, L. M., & Miller, N. A theoretical analysis of crossed categorization effects: A meta-analysis // Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74, рр. 894-908.

Uspenskaya, O.A.   Urovni formirovaniya organizatsionnoy identichnosti sotrudnikov [Levels of Formation of Organizational Identity of Employees] // Novaya nauka: Opyt, traditsii, innovatsii [New Science: Experience, Traditions, Innovations], 2017, 3-4, рр. 81-85. [in Russian].

Yadov, V.A. Sotsial'nyye i sotsial'no-psikhologicheskiye mekhanizmy formirovaniya sotsial'noy identichnosti lichnosti [Social and socio-psychological mechanisms of the formation of social identity of a person] // Mir Rossii [World of Russia], 1995, 3-4, рр. 158-181. [in Russian].

bottom of page